Ideally I intend to get both. I've enjoyed the Sniper Elite series for a while now, and I'd rather have 3rd persion than 1st anyway, but Sniper Ghost Warrior 3 has something to offer too. And I care nothing for multiplayer so that has nothing to do with my decision making. Sniper Elite 4 will be WW2 era, and SGW3 will be modern era. So there's that too. If they were both in the same era I might consider one over the other, but since they are not, I won't think about it.
Ghost Sniper Warrior 3 Weapon Locations
Jan 16, 2015 Sniper Elite 4 Sniper Ghost Warrior 3I think based on previous track record of both games. Without a doubt sniper elite will be better. But since ghost warrior 3 is trying to be different it. Feb 27, 2013 - Sniper Elite 2 is the game that uses weapons from the old era ( WW2 ) - Ghost Warrior is the game that focuses on modern weapons (sniper weapons and such). Personally i played them both and had a real good time, they are equal imho:).
The only thing that has bothered me about the SE series is the often thin story telling. Though the gameplay has kept me interested.I didn't like SGW1, and I cannot remember liking SGW2. After seeing videos and reading about SGW3, I jumped to sign up for the Beta. And I'm glad I did. To me it seems like a vast improvement over the previous two games and makes me actually want to buy it. The only bug I noticed in the Beta was that there were times when it wouldn't allow me to move the bodies, where in other times I could.
Not sure the reason for it, but it was a Beta. I haven't seen much to make me think there will be much of a story in SGW3, and I'm hoping they are just holding that back. I do like the 'take it however you want' mentality that is in the third game in case I want to switch things up. I like that in any game.
Being able to adjust my scope, etc is also very appealing and I wish other series would take that into consideration as well, but they often don't. Originally posted by:I just feel like CI interactive is giving us the free seasons pass with the game to make it more compelling for us to buy.This shows that they aren't confident to sell the game on its own and charge the full price. You know the saying. If its to good to be true it probably is.:)Or they could genuinely be passionate about their new project, and are trying to give back to us for the constant feedback and support? Just look at how active they've been in these forums.
Such most replies are the same 'Send your DxDiag file' but they're just reminding people so they can get more info for the game. Originally posted by:Well what i suggest is that we wait for the reviewers to decide whether its worth our money. Granted the devs are responding to our feedback but how much of it is actuallly been resloved. Besides i find the game to be very repetitive. All the missions are the same- seek and kill.The AI is just a disaster, very generic voice acting and are so predictable.We only played 2 missions, neither of them were the same.In one, we redirected satellite dishes, in the other, we assassinated a dangerous war-criminal.They have fixed the AI, over the course of a 4 day long beta. I'd say that's a lot of dedication.At first, the AI alerted an entire outpost as soon as they even glanced at you, now it takes them a few seconds to spot you and react.I don't see many problems with this game as of yet.
These developers are truly trying to make an enjoyable experience, and they show it.